![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Not that either are mutually exclusive for one to be considered a "collector"; I would agree the definition can be very broad. I started collecting at age 9 in 1986, and was if I'm remembering correctly already totally engrossed by the "old" cards I had discovered, anything pre-1980's - less than two years later. Given the state of the hobby and when I found such things, there has never been a time I can remember where the value of cards just wasn't a concern at all. Those days were already gone. Even for new cards, and the Mattinglys and Cansecos we were looking to pull from Topps, Donruss, and Fleer packs when I started - it was understood that some cards are more valuable than others, and if you didn't realize that well, here came your friends with their Beckett Monthly's who quickly filled you in. I started off with raw vintage, so to me a slab has more or less always been a vehicle to make sure you don't get ripped off buying something sight unseen, on ebay or elsewhere. If a pricey card - generally $100 or more, but I've bought slabs intentionally for lower value too - then if I target a PSA 5, I can usually be reasonably sure the card is not going to arrive with a hidden crease. But there is limited utility here. To me, a slab is just a holder with an opinion on it. Neither have to be permanent. As the times change so do collectors and practices and attitudes and opinions. I can't stand them much now, but in the late 1980's - all my cards, whether in set or random order - were in binders. It's just what you did, everyone had a card album. Today I prefer organizing differently, but I also have boxes full of slabs. Had I been big time into this stuff before the retail hobby, maybe back in the 1930's - I'm sure I would have mounted cards in albums just like Burdick and Carter, and others did. So as it circles back to slabs, maybe it's just a "collector of the times" thing. We may think slabs are childish and stupid 50 years from now; who knows. I kinda doubt that, but it's possible. As to the value, because it's again just how I grew up collecting - sure, it's of secondary purpose to me - because I collect due to enjoying nostalgia and I just genuinely like the cards themselves. But I would be in the camp that for some things I have, it would be foolish to just totally ignore value, and not to have a plan for these things in the future, etc. So that's what I do.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 11-01-2024 at 12:46 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New way to collect cards | mrreality68 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-07-2022 10:50 AM |
Anyone collect sportscaster cards? | frankbmd | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 02-28-2015 11:43 AM |
anyone here not collect cards? | JoeyF1981 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 21 | 11-02-2013 03:08 PM |
what other cards do you collect | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 02-09-2004 12:57 PM |
Graded cards--do you collect them or not? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 01-17-2003 05:31 PM |