![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For those with experience in this: For this scrapbook pull of a 3-1/4 by 5-3/8 in. vintage card, will SGC typically assign a number grade if there are slight paper remnants on the back, or is it an automatic Authentic? Does paper addition make it "altered" by definition?
Appreciate any insight! Last edited by Brent G.; 09-22-2024 at 08:44 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1951 Red Back - grading question… perforation? | Belfast1933 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 07-04-2021 10:31 AM |
How much of a deal breaker is paper loss on the back of a card for you? | Bored5000 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 04-02-2018 11:53 AM |
WTB - T-206 with scrapbook Remnants on Back | Blwilson2 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 07-03-2016 06:51 AM |
1929 Becker Bros. Theatre- remnants question/poll? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 05-16-2011 10:36 PM |
A Grading Question-regarding Paper Loss! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-30-2007 08:12 PM |