![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The good news:
My three-card order with a 1-2 Business Day estimated turnaround entered post-grading and I received a tracking number two days after SGC received the submission. The bad news: Two of the three cards were misidentified and mislabeled, even though I had correctly identified them on the submission form. They identified my 1931 W502 card as a 1931 W-UNC, despite the fact that mine has "One Bagger" on the back and the 1931 W502 set is already in SGC's database. They also identified my W511 unnumbered card as a "#71," even though mine has no number and is clearly different from the #71s that they've previously graded. The worse news: SGC support responded with this: Quote:
Now I'm wondering if the fact that SGC couldn't properly identify the cards in the first place impacted their decision to take the $500 and send them back raw. This makes me sad because I greatly prefer SGC slabs, but now I feel like I can't entrust them with my cards. ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by gunboat82; 08-29-2024 at 08:28 AM. Reason: Links |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Whoops! Wonder how many times PSA has done this? | hcv123 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 24 | 09-16-2023 02:22 PM |
How the times have changed | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-20-2021 12:51 PM |
How many times per day | BigBeerGut | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-18-2019 12:26 PM |
Saco River Auction "processing fee" | BosseFieldBoy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 09-20-2017 11:58 AM |
OT Credit card processing used by members | sb1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-28-2015 02:12 PM |