 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
08-27-2024, 10:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Opinion
I think that there are still a significant number of ungraded major cards out there that would counterbalance any duplicates of submission with old labels. Many older collectors who aren’t planning on selling are holding on to “raw” cards that haven’t changed hands for decades . Hence I think almost any population number is UNDER reported and sometimes significantly so. Just my opinion…..
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone have anything i need. Paying substantial rewards | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 06-23-2023 08:59 PM |
| How do you really know the true psa population? | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 07-11-2012 01:30 PM |
| "TRUE" population of a card | zljones | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-27-2012 01:08 PM |
| True Population of the 1914 Mathewson | jboosted92 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-01-2009 05:44 PM |
| Recent Inheritance / Find - Nothing Substantial - Few ?'s | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-13-2008 09:21 PM |
Threaded Mode