![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They have different grading standards. It would be a mess. Some people would be really disappointed with some lower-graded crossovers.
I like SGC, but grades of 2 and below get really generous compared to many PSA examples. You can have holes and markings on a card and still get a 2 with SGC. There's other differences up/down the number scale between PSA/SGC, but it's really evident in 2 and below. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why is the SGC Pop Report Getting Ignored? | Sterling Sports Auctions | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 08-04-2024 09:32 PM |
Pop Report | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-30-2009 06:45 PM |
Pop report | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 03-30-2009 04:25 PM |
PSA Pop Report | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 03-17-2007 11:23 AM |
T3 Pop report | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-13-2005 10:38 AM |