|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
1957 Topps….size variance?
Hey all.
I was looking at a raw 1957 Topps Pee Wee Reese I bought last year, and it struck me that the borders were just the slightest amount thinner than I expected. I pulled out another ‘57 Topps, a Gil Hodges I bought direct from Battersbox, and compared them. The width is spot on, however, the height of the Reese card looks to be slightly under a millimeter short. Examining the Reese under a loupe, the edge cut doesn’t jump out to me as being trimmed. Do these ‘57 Topps ever exhibit any size variance. Is less than a millimeter top to bottom within normal variance? It’s a beautiful card, otherwise. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1968 Topps Size Variance | bedfo1jl | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 01-08-2020 05:26 PM |
'33 Goudey size variance? | brob28 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-13-2016 03:52 PM |
T205 Size Variance | Centauri | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-02-2014 04:56 PM |
Size Variance??????? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-16-2007 07:20 AM |
Size Variance? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-26-2007 02:19 PM |