 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
02-10-2024, 02:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
If PSA were to lower the grade (for a card in an old pristine PSA holder) wouldn't that make them responsible for the difference in value between the original holder grade and the reassessed grade? It was PSA's misjudgment the first time around.
It would just be a cross-over if it were SGC to PSA and then PSA would probably scrutinize it a bit more. If the grade were lowered by PSA, then that's just the way it is.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cracker Jack trimming question | rainier2004 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-15-2011 07:26 PM |
| cracker jack question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-18-2009 09:01 AM |
| Question about Cracker Jack cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-07-2007 03:26 AM |
| 1914 Cracker Jack Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-07-2005 09:59 PM |
| Cracker Jack Packaging Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-02-2005 12:24 PM |
Threaded Mode