![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I totally understand and agree but simply by looking at all of the PSA and SGC Wagner's it is clear that is not the case. All of them are overgraded on the typical scale and I suspect it will have no choice but to continue. Its just not fair to the next card to be graded any differently than all of it's predecessors.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone need a T206 Honus Wagner? | WWG | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 05-07-2018 09:09 PM |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
Honus Wagner T206 | swschultz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-22-2010 07:22 PM |
T206 Honus Wagner PSA 8 | ichieh | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-09-2010 07:02 PM |
WTB: T206 Honus Wagner | mintacular | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 05-04-2010 12:05 PM |