![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pop report on an SGC 8 is only 6 total with none higher with 40 graded total.
I would NEVER send a card to SGC in a PSA holder. That being said you have a conundrum here. It is honestly a very nice looking card and most likely could have gotten a straight PSA 8. That OC in this case is certainly borderline. You could send it back to PSA and ask for no qualifier but why? It's a MINT 9. I feel the OC is a bit BS to be honest. SGC would grade this a 6 to an 8 and most likely a 7 but it might be worth the risk if you need an 8. If this were my card, I'd be proud to own it. You have a good eye. I'd probably break it out and get an honest grade from SGC. It would look a heck of a lot better even in a 6 or a 7 SGC holder. My opinion only. Please keep us posted. ![]() PS I love "shaggy" edges and usually factory fresh shaggy edges help a card that has never been tampered with. This card BELONGS in an SGC holder. Last edited by vthobby; 02-01-2024 at 10:57 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crossover question | Huck | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-07-2023 04:18 PM |
1955 Crossover - Opinions | toledo_mudhen | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 08-25-2014 02:51 PM |
Crossover Question | John V | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 01-04-2012 12:51 AM |
PSA to SGC crossover question | Section103 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-03-2011 07:50 PM |
PSA to SGC Crossover Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 03-14-2008 10:29 AM |