 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
03-02-2023, 12:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
That's interesting, I wonder which came first.
What I'm still thinking that this one pretty much proves the sheets being the same, and used for multiple brands including the smaller brands. The Murry is just a bit more, and I'm thinking may come from the same sheet. It seems plausible that whatever caused the transfers to not transfer properly did it multiple times on the same stone. Of course it's not 100%, and leaves some questions, but each little bit pushes those questions farther toward "unlikely" and other ideas farther towards "probably" A huge improvement over "nobody knows, or is even close to knowing" 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Print Flaws... It's Not Just About the $$$ | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-30-2023 08:36 AM |
| 1952 topps Printing flaws vs errors VS variations rehash fun for some, not for others | Republicaninmass | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 10-14-2017 09:52 AM |
| What card flaws are acceptable for your PC? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 11-25-2013 06:02 PM |
| FS: T205 Edward Barger - Both Variations $35 for the pair **PRICE DROP** | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 06-17-2013 03:14 PM |
| What flaws do you spot on this Ruth? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 86 | 04-23-2008 07:58 PM |
Threaded Mode