![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the concept of qualifiers but only for factory defects. The card is the exact condition it was made in, but according to aTPG it is determined to be outside a certain arbitrary standard , thus has this qualifier. I think it provides a lot of information on the condition of the actual card. I wish they would add a qualifier for a rough cut, nothing worst than a straight 8 that looks like a 69 Deckle edge. Also if a card has been marked or stained or doesn’t meet a size standard, it shouldn’t receive a numerical grade, only an A and the reason and let the buyer determine the value.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA grading/pricing question | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-20-2022 12:45 PM |
CGC Grading Pricing | Stampsfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-22-2020 06:41 PM |
FYI: New Beckett Card Grading Pricing & Turnaround Times | ngnichols | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-12-2017 08:31 AM |
A Qualified Peeve | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-18-2014 08:43 PM |
Psa grading and pricing | Toneal13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 11-29-2013 10:51 AM |