![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think this idea needs some refinement 😀
That said, I do agree that there are issues with this “1” bucket that seems to cast an ever-increasingly large net. The “poor” designation now seems capable of having its own 1-10 scale.
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this a crazy idea? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 03-01-2017 10:43 AM |
Crazy Idea... | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-03-2011 08:22 PM |
Crazy idea | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 07-24-2008 07:59 PM |
t206 Wagner (crazy idea) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-24-2008 03:53 PM |
new idea for grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 12-12-2005 02:00 PM |