![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
new content added to the main post, pasting it in here for those who stopped reading the updated first post!
Entry #3, 18Aug2022 This will be a shorter entry here, but I felt it was interesting enough (to me) to add into the main post. As I noted in the thread, I am trying to work on a way (using my average Excel skills) to better capture raw card sales data. I still haven't worked out a way I love yet, but I have been playing around with Terapeak the last few days, and I was able to put together some generalized data. Terapeak allows you to pull data on sales up to 365 days old. You can only view the actual auctions for the past 90 days, but Terapeak keeps records of the sale price, shipping, date, etc for 365 days. For the purposes of this quick exercise, I realize I cannot drill down to the player level, but I figured that if I stripped out the exceptional HoF cards, I may be able to get data that is at least interesting to look at until I come up with a better method. So, in the Terapeak search box, I used a string similar to what I use when creating ebay alerts for myself, adding in excluders like -reprint -rp -renata -honus etc to try and weed out all the junk that typically shows up, and I also added excluders for PSA, SGC, BGS, BVG, GMA, etc, to remove all graded cards. Once I had this list filtered, I sorted for most expensive cards and then least expensive. Terapeak shows you 50 results per page, so I was able to manually exclude a few graded cards that didn't include the grading acronym in the title, I removed a Demmitt Polar Bear because it would skew the avg price of a Polar Bear sale, and I also added in excluders for "cobb" "mathewson" and "cy" to remove those super expensive cards. I could have removed them manually, but that was too much work. I essentially wanted to compare the Commons, Tough Cards, and HoF outside of the most expensive in the set against the data from VCP for graded cards. This data is not perfect, and should taken with a grain of salt, but I think its a decent enough approximation to discuss. I decided to do a quick search for the common backs and then the offbacks. I did not bother with any of the very rare backs since they sell so infrequently, and they are almost always graded when they do sell. Here is the chart, with an explainer below ![]()
One thing to add here that I didn't add in the main post (will edit it later) is that I think the interesting thing to remember here is that a common/less famous card is more likely to sell raw than graded, I would think. You see a few raw copies of like a Chance Red Portrait or Brown Portrait or Lundgren Chicago, but those cards are getting graded at a higher frequency than Casey, Wright and Pickering. Still, it is interesting to compare the average cost and to look at the volume of off backs that sell raw.
__________________
My T206 research thread My T205 Census thread Want list: M101-2, T205s (American Beauties) Last edited by 53toppscollector; 08-18-2022 at 08:08 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ty Cobb Back Scarcity vs. Brown Old Mill Back Scarcity | DixieBaseball | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 06-28-2013 10:04 AM |
Red Cross vs. Red Hindu--scarcity & pricing | nolemmings | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-28-2013 12:23 PM |
E107 Scarcity & Pricing | Collect Equity | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-08-2011 05:20 PM |
T206 back scarcity and pricing analysis | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-19-2007 04:09 PM |
T207 Pricing and Scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-25-2004 07:41 AM |