![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This card should remain as is, in my opinion. I'm not against restoration, but adding 45% of something else to this card would simply be bizarre.
As with a paper currency, it has to be over 50% there to count as "a card." It's logically impossible to have 2 or 3 "one card." Then you're dealing in parts of cards. I assume if it's less than 50 percent, PSA wouldn't grade it as a card anyway. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted. M101-1 Wagner and M110 and M 101-2 Wagner and Wagner/Cobb | iowadoc77 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 08-26-2018 06:55 PM |
Wagner cards more common than the T206 Wagner | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 69 | 05-12-2017 07:11 PM |
E92 Wagner, E102 Wagner, T205 Cobb, T206 Gandil, and M116 Mcgraw ending AM 7/29/2013 | gabrinus | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 07-27-2013 07:12 AM |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
FS: T206 Heine Wagner ("the other T206 Wagner") PSA 4 - $79 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2007 08:46 PM |