 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
07-19-2021, 07:17 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Agree with the OP on those earlier Mantles. He could have his own good bad and ugly post.
The good  I never understood why this card doesn't get more love. It is his rookie card and an example of good artwork. Along with the 1953 Bowman and 1965 Topps, his best looking cards in my opinion. The bad 1953 Topps is just bad artwork. Most of the cards in the set are poor representations of the subjects and amatuerish in my opinion. The ugly The 1952 Topps is just plain ugly. Giving Mantle a yellow bat makes no sense to me. Also another weak Topps design. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Good, the Bad and the Ugly | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 01-02-2018 04:25 PM |
| Mantle Good, Bad, or Just Plain Ugly?? | ruth-gehrig | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 7 | 12-14-2015 07:43 PM |
| Good, Bad or Ugly? | Exhibitman | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 0 | 03-20-2013 11:18 AM |
| FS: M116-The Good, the Bad and the Ugly | sox1903wschamp | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 12-11-2009 11:11 AM |
| good, bad, and ugly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-20-2003 02:12 PM |
Threaded Mode