 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
07-01-2021, 07:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Don't know the answer to your question, but I actually have been lovin' the 7 inning games. In fact, I would like to see it become a permanent thing for all 162 games.
The upsides are numerous: less wear and tear on the players; fewer pitchers needed; starting pitching becomes more important again; shorter game times; more double-headers could be scheduled which would result in more days off and a later start to the season. What's the downside? I know it would mess with the stats a bit, but a full season used to be 154 games and even fewer than that if you go way back, so the at-bats wouldn't drop that much by comparison. I don't know who enjoys 4 hour baseball games, but it ain't me. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 7 Inning No Hitter | Jim65 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 0 | 08-26-2020 05:26 AM |
| Baltimore (Colored) Giants games plus WS games 1935 Scorebook | ramram | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 05-15-2019 09:53 AM |
| Baseball games: 19th century/early 20th board games;coin ops; card games. B/s/t | bsblgmexpert | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 09-08-2010 11:32 AM |
| Baseball games: 19th century/early 20th board games;coin ops; card games. B/s/t | bsblgmexpert | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 09-08-2010 11:30 AM |
| 7th Inning Stretch | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-31-2003 01:27 AM |
Threaded Mode