 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-04-2021, 11:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
What used to be the consensus on getting Vintage cards signed?
I feel like getting cards signed now, is pretty commonplace, especially with the advent of companies releasing cards with players autographs on them. For those that have been in the Hobby for a long time, and started collecting during the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80s etc, how did people back then feel about getting their cards signed? Did people pass on an opportunity to get a card signed because they thought it would "ruin" the card?
__________________
Successful Deals With: charlietheexterminator, todeen, tonyo, Santo10fan Bocabirdman (5x), 8thEastVB, JCMTiger, Rjackson44 Republicaninmass, 73toppsmann, quinnsryche (2x), Donscards. Last edited by Seven; 02-04-2021 at 11:31 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| signed cards HOF some vintage | theshleps | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 1 | 05-07-2017 12:14 PM |
| What is the general consensus on Topps Now? | Tennis13 | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 8 | 07-15-2016 09:30 PM |
| vintage signed cards FS | theshleps | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 05-02-2015 07:53 AM |
| FS: HOF and Vintage Signed Cards--$235 for Lot! | Smanzari | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 9 | 03-21-2013 04:45 AM |
| Consensus on re-trimming hand-cut cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-16-2009 05:25 PM |
Threaded Mode