 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think it is OK to "keyword spam" Ebay auctions? | |||
| Yes, it is OK to put PSA and BVG into titles of SGC cards!!! |
   
|
5 | 3.36% |
| No, the auction title should ONLY have the grader who graded the card!!! |
  
|
111 | 74.50% |
| I could care less either way!! Whatever the seller wants to do is fine with me! |
  
|
33 | 22.15% |
| Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
12-31-2020, 09:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Spamming
I’m seeing more and more sellers either list their cards as PSA, SGC, BVG numerically graded and they are not .. or just putting a numerical grade on themselves. Deans and STARX have been doing that all along which has zero credibility w/me but I guess in the bigger picture it’s not much different than anyone listing their cards as EX, EX/MT, etc.
Some of this stuff, obviously, is purposely meant to deceive. This clown below keeps listing his SGC graded cards as a grade higher on PSA. https://www.ebay.com/itm/1970-Topps-...0AAOSw-ktfqyRq Last edited by Edwolf1963; 12-31-2020 at 09:54 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
| Rizzuto & Slaughter "Real" RC Debate | Robextend | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 08-07-2011 01:06 PM |
| the "Who's greater" debate | Touch'EmAll | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 11 | 10-01-2010 11:11 AM |
| Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 135 | 08-12-2007 11:10 PM |
| Last night's "debate" .....some interesting observations. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 04-25-2004 06:52 PM |
Threaded Mode