 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
09-25-2020, 01:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Expert here
I'd think the one on the left might grade a tad higher, but with an MC qualifier. 1.5(MC) or 2(MC) for the left and a 1 or maybe 1.5 for the right with that paper loss. Both are pretty nice cards still. Good lower grade eye appeal! Last edited by oldeboo; 09-25-2020 at 01:38 PM. Reason: Addition 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
| 2 out of 3 mislabeled, are the grading companies really experts? | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-19-2012 07:24 AM |
| Grading Experts..I need some advice:) | YankeeCollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-11-2011 03:24 AM |
| Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
| Honoring Satchel Paige....show/tell us of your Paige items | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-22-2009 08:07 AM |
Threaded Mode