![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just a few quick thoughts regarding the OP’s inquiry. I agree that, with the exception of Pied Fact 42, there tends to be no premium between Piedmont and Sweet Cap backs; maybe a tiny bump for an SC Fact 649 overprint.
That said, some backs can be real tough sometimes. For example, I have found that SC 150 and 350, Factory 25, can be real tough with some player-fronts. I have paid more for those backs, but only bc I needed the front/back combo; I do not believe I will get my money back bc of the back if/when I go sell. Some people try to pump up the SC 350-460 fact 42. I think that’s crap. I would not pay a dime extra for that back. Finally, personally, I prefer series 150 to 350, because I like have the 1909 version over the 1910 version. Last edited by Rhotchkiss; 06-03-2020 at 04:57 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"WITHDRAWN" T206 Ty Cobb Sovereign/Polar Bear/Common | GoBigRed | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-08-2020 09:18 AM |
1964 Topps Football "uncommon common" | jason.1969 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 05-15-2019 09:30 AM |
Show a "rare" variation of a common autograph | packs | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 46 | 04-16-2018 05:12 AM |
Top "Common" & "HOFer" On Your Wantlist | pgellis | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-12-2012 12:14 AM |
T206 Joe Doyle Question (or "The Uncommon Common") | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-20-2007 12:37 PM |