 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-07-2019, 11:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Impact of gumstains on value
Hi All,
It's been a long while since I've posted, as some other projects meant I had to take a break from collecting. But I'm looking to get back into the hobby, and taking a bit of a pivot. I've been a PSA collector, but I'm thinking of taking a step back, and collecting raw cards I can store in an album. I specialize in '52 Topps, and I'm eyeing a few nice raw cards on ebay. But a few of them have gumstains on the reverse. Gumstains weren't really an issue when I collected PSA, as I was pretty selected and went for grade, but now I have some decisions to make. Which leads to my question: what, if any, impact do gum stains have on a card's value, specifically, when they are on the reverse? Would you consider that to be card damage on par with holes or paper loss? Or are they more acceptable than other flaws? I'd love your opinions! Thanks all, BR 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Who had a positive impact on your collection ? | Baseballcrazy62 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 148 | 12-30-2024 07:32 PM |
| Impact of the MC and/or MK designation | TheBigRedOne | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-27-2017 05:43 AM |
| Where do you all stand on gumstains? | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 10-30-2013 01:32 AM |
| Impact of Net 54 on SCP/Sothebys | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 09-15-2007 05:44 PM |
| Impact of the Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 07-17-2007 02:17 PM |
Threaded Mode