 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-02-2019, 11:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Normal Size Discrepancies in Cards (E90-1)
For the people who collect and/or have knowledge of E90-1 cards and/or similar cards, is there a size tolerance that can be explained by factors other than trimming? For example, the standard size of the E90-1 set is 1 1/2" wide x 2 3/4" tall. If a card measures 1 1/2" wide but is 1/32" shorter than 2 3/4," would you consider that a normal variance or is that a sign that an alteration may have taken place?
I would appreciate any guidance on this. Thanks, Eric
__________________
Contact me if you have any Dave Kingman cards / memorabilia for sale. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it normal for T202s tobe miscut? | Mark17 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-04-2016 02:44 PM |
| eBay T206 raw individual auction - all appear normal? | Edwolf1963 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-08-2016 11:57 AM |
| PSA Pop Report Discrepancies - T206 Brown Washington Old Mill | T206.org | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-13-2014 12:59 PM |
| 1933 Goudey Variation - or just normal wear? | SMPEP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-27-2011 10:07 PM |
| Normal habbit when SCD comes in | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 09-30-2005 10:31 PM |
Threaded Mode