![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The last two statements above are false.
The number of Ramly cards that are not solid stock is very, very small, (I have seen one small group in nearly 30 years of collecting and a few singles here and there). The embossing will not soak out nor press out fully, it will still be present even if placed under pressure. The half-tone will get very fragile and can easily be damaged while wet, creating very small spots of paper loss, with just the lightest touch of fingers or other contact. The offered card exhibits some of the above characteristics. Last edited by sb1; 11-10-2019 at 04:45 PM. Reason: To expound on the facts |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gone with the stain | BigBeerGut | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 130 | 09-12-2019 05:53 PM |
No Stain No Gain | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 09-25-2017 06:53 PM |
What is that stain on the card? | Pythonfactory | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-30-2014 10:13 AM |
Stain or Transfer | Bwstew | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-11-2012 04:21 PM |
33 Goudey gum stain? | mighty bombjack | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-12-2011 08:43 PM |