|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant to our hobby or not?
I’d say it is. And I don’t know any scandal rocking that hobby akin to what’s going on on with cards.
Lots of the same logic would seem to apply here. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ish-collectors |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hobby history: The hobby 50 years ago, July 1967 | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-23-2017 03:41 PM |
Hobby history: The hobby in 1979 | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-27-2017 11:07 AM |
Hobby history: Card dealers of the 1960s: James T. Elder (+ hobby drama, 1968-69) | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-08-2017 05:23 PM |
Need Cedar Rapids (Bunnies? 1897?) roster relevant to 1898 Cameo Pepsin | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-28-2009 10:13 PM |
Is Beckett's Becoming Relevant? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-24-2007 05:19 PM |