 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
07-26-2019, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
He's saying it is relative to pop. So for example if there are 10,000 Flick T206s and 1,000 T207 Chances then the % of cards with that respective back is roughly the same.
I see the other side as well, which is why I said the rarity is equivalent to Uzits. If there is only one known example of a card and it therefore only has one back then the odds of getting that back on that card are 100%, so easier to find than a T206 Piedmont 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about Anonymous brown ink T207 back | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-06-2010 05:55 PM |
| T207 back question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-01-2005 07:18 PM |
| T207 Back Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-02-2003 03:43 PM |
| question regarding t205 & t207 back rarity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-01-2003 02:52 PM |
| T207 back question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-21-2002 04:38 PM |
Threaded Mode