 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
06-08-2019, 03:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Was the card just less dirty, or were stains removed? Did the image lose clarity because of the soaking?
If it was one of those 1951 Bowmans with previous wax stains, I would say those were very likely chemically cleaned. However, since you first tried to get made whole by PWCC, you should now go to PSA.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Brent/PWCC interview on recent controversies | Stonepony | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 204 | 05-27-2019 05:33 PM |
| PWCC Recent Closings | Exhibitman | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 8 | 03-29-2018 04:05 PM |
| Recent PWCC Auction | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-08-2016 12:50 PM |
| Thoughts on this card? (trimming, stain, etc) | scmavl | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 04-01-2011 11:32 AM |
| Interesting Story Concerning Card Trimming and Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-10-2002 05:43 PM |
Threaded Mode