The facts I am positing my question on are :
1. Company B has a stated policy of crossing over slabbed cards from company A that meet company B's criteria. If we are talking about Company A being SGC and Company B being PSA, unless things have changed, PSA will cross over SGC cards if they meet PSA's criteria.
2. It can be proven that the reason the cards will not be crossed over is some unstated rule that PSA wants to put SGC out of business and in furtherance of that end they will not cross over SGC cards.
3. The reason PSA gives in returning the cards not crossed over is that they do not satisfy PSA's criteria.
4. SGC loses a lot of customers and suffers significant damages.
5. In time PSA becomes the only remaining TPG in the hobby.
Under those facts (which let's assume can be proven), Peter, are you saying SGC has no actionable claim against PSA, and also that this has nothing to do with antitrust law?
Last edited by benjulmag; 05-22-2019 at 02:02 PM.
|
05-22-2019, 01:14 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode