![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'd say they're close to SGC when they were good, but I don't have personal experience. I've bought some SCD graded 1952 Topps for my PSA set, cracked them out, and they did okay, even with PSA being thought to have tightened their standards: https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...7&postcount=45 Of course, I think I bought them all for around PSA 4-5 prices, so even the ones the dropped still "improved" in value.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 03-28-2019 at 07:02 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Crossover Experiment | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 04-16-2018 05:40 PM |
100 experiment | cardsnstuff | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-29-2016 01:56 PM |
My PSA Experiment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 05-01-2008 06:17 PM |
My experiment on the BST | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-03-2007 04:24 PM |
An experiment with PRO | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-05-2003 02:26 AM |