 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
03-10-2019, 08:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Look at the back; there is no border on the back side. That's why it got the MC qualifier, as well as showing part of the adjoining card. That is a textbook MC. There are some issues where they are a little more forgiving, like 1955 Bowman, where the front and back were almost always slightly misaligned.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 03-10-2019 at 08:30 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1967 Topps -Diamond cuts? | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 07-12-2016 06:29 PM |
| Diamond Cuts and grading companies | TanksAndSpartans | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-15-2015 11:56 PM |
| Lets see your ice (diamond cuts) | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 06-12-2012 10:52 AM |
| diamond cuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-03-2005 02:32 PM |
| Diamond Cuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-17-2003 06:43 PM |
Threaded Mode