Quote:
Originally Posted by whitehse
Honestly, I dont think they would lose tons of business but rather their business would improve as many fence sitters like me, who refuse to give up our cards for an indefinite period of time, perhaps even up to a full year would submit to them if their service improved. I have tried SGC and no matter how badly I wanted them to succeed, I have my doubts if they will ever find a foothold in this hobby that even approaches PSA's level.
As to your comment about cutting down on the crack and resubmit process, I believe there will still be those out there who no matter how the cards are being graded.
Speeding up the efficiency and accuracy of the grading process would find PSA with even more submissions than they ever imagined they could have.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth
Maybe I should have worded my post better. My whole post was just about the business they would lose from the crack and resubmit game. Between this forum and BO I have seen hundreds of posts about doing it. I have also seen advertising from businesses/people that specialize in it.
When someone does get a computer program that will give the same grade to the same card every time they will lose that whole section of submitters.
I personally would welcome the change to computer grading.
|
Please do not misconstrue my remarks either. I do not wish for PSA's unfettered success at the expense of SGC, Beckett, GEM or PRO. If the TPG business becomes more of a monopoly, how can customer service be expected to improve. They already have a stranglehold on the Registry crowd, despite oft cited inconsistency and customer service that leaves much to be desired. If the Registry was amenable to an antitrust action to loosen their stranglehold, perhaps we could enter an age of true competition in the TPG market with jousting robots competing for market share.