![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just doing some reading and trying to educate myself further, I am curious why a Pete Runnels MT-9 52 Topps card is valued at $18,000 where as a MT-9 Joe Nuxhall is only valued at $7,500?
I understand Runnels card is the #2 card in the set but Nuxhalls is the 2nd last one in the set, (same positions but different ends of the set) but Nuxhalls is a high number card. Is it based on their careers/popularity/availability or is there something else? https://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/ba...unnels-2/22877 https://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/ba...hall-406/23425 Just curious. ![]()
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fs: 1952 topps #2 pete runnels sgc 60 centered. TO EBAY | cammb | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-11-2014 11:23 AM |
FS: 1952 Topps #2 Pete Runnels PSA 6 NO LONGER 4 SALE | cammb | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-13-2014 07:33 AM |
WTB/WTTF: 1955 Don Wingfield PC of Pete Runnels | ValKehl | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-31-2013 09:44 PM |
FS: 1952 Topps #2 Pete Runnels Beautiful | cammb | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-01-2013 08:20 PM |
1954 Topps Baseball Pete Runnels PSA 9 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-04-2005 07:00 PM |