 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
07-25-2018, 10:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I think that it is because not all cards come with all backs. Also, the set was issued in series and some brands were only available in one series. It certainly adds value to the rarer backs. If Drum or Uzit was its own set, would most people care about them? As a t206 collector, not only do I want one of each front, but I want as many different examples of different backs as I can get.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: T206 Nap Rucker PSA 5 Double factory designation! | CMIZ5290 | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 06-18-2013 05:20 PM |
| Fs/ft: T206 nap rucker psa 5 double factory designation!! | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-04-2012 04:34 PM |
| ** On Hold ** T206 Tinker Portrait - NO Factory designation | PEEK enterprises | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-25-2009 08:47 PM |
| T206 Magie on Ebay -- Without that annoying factory designation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-15-2007 11:26 AM |
| Partial red designation ???? On t206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-02-2006 09:19 PM |
Threaded Mode