 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
06-09-2018, 07:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I also would’ve gone with Topps. I’m assuming that I wouldn’t know what each set looked like ahead of time. For me, the big drawback with Bowman is that with the exception of some 1949 cards, 1951 and 1955, they either didn’t put the players name on the front at all, or used a facsimile signature. I don’t like that I have to either decipher their handwriting or know them by face.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB 1952 topps nickel pack | Republicaninmass | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-23-2016 09:23 AM |
| 1919 US Buffalo Nickel | Ben Yourg | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 11-16-2015 05:31 PM |
| Ping ISI Nickel Irons Black Dot 3-PW LH | botport | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2015 09:53 AM |
| It's 1953..and you have a nickel.. | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 30 | 06-14-2014 09:05 PM |
| If I only had a nickel..... | Bigdaddy | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 22 | 01-22-2012 09:26 PM |
Threaded Mode