 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22
05-29-2018, 11:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I think they are nicely done for what they are. They are not pieces of art. Perhaps the original paintings that were used to generate these pieces are art, but these are more akin to the posters of paintings. I would think if someone wants nice images of great ball players they can buy a nice photographic book and have real images, which are preferable to me, at a lot cheaper price. I would never buy them and I think that somewhere on the piece there should be a disclaimer that they are not period pieces. Otherwise, some novice will be fooled.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Don't be surprised if..... (HOF debate!) | jimivintage | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 09-03-2014 08:53 PM |
| PSA vs SGC...the definitive Debate!!! | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 139 | 06-29-2012 06:21 PM |
| HOF Debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-17-2009 10:50 PM |
| Restoration debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-19-2006 01:24 PM |
| A Great Debate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-22-2002 11:15 PM |
Threaded Mode