![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Tin Top set is far and away the more interesting set, once one gets past the novelty of the red borders being different.
The problem with the Red Border set is that it is simply a reprint of the regular E254 set but with lower quality images and often with poor centering. The exception being two Louisvile players that have not yet been found in the regular E254 set and a few small stylistic changes (like we see on the Cobb, Hughes,etc) that have their names on their chests instead of floating in the air by their heads. These exceptions also sell much better and for higher amounts than their regular Red Border counterparts. The Tin Top set consists of almost 50% new players that were not in the E254 set along with a lot of team changes and in all honesty the player selection is superior (Jackson, Thorpe, Johnson, And many other HoFers not featured in the earlier sets). I have always paid more and had an easier time selling the Tin Tops than the Red Borders.
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1909 Colgan's Chips Bill Bailey SGC 50 + Beautiful Colgan's Tin | Moonlight Graham | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-07-2015 01:27 PM |
A rarity indeed | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 10-21-2009 12:45 PM |
Rarity | Bicem | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 111 | 07-24-2009 12:17 PM |
A real rarity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-11-2006 01:34 PM |
Anyone know the relative rarity of E-98's? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-14-2003 08:34 AM |