 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23
02-27-2017, 05:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I agree. Not sure why there is even any debate. I know its a hobby but as i said before you will see many people in the hobby eventually sell their cards for 'medication, new improvement on house, college' etc. So if you were going to sell your cards, would you rather sell a same graded card thats PSA to get more medication or sell the SGC same graded card and with that money get less medication. I dont care how pretty the holder is.
However, as stated, if you have the chance to get a grade higher on your submission with SGC that would increase interest at least in the short term 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Should Seller Reimburse Buyer For Grading Fees? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 11-24-2009 10:08 PM |
| 1961 Fleer Baseball PSA lot (below grading fees) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-25-2008 10:11 PM |
| Change in SGC grading fees | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-09-2008 10:42 AM |
| PSA T3 grading fees | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 02-01-2007 03:35 PM |
| Grading fees from PSA and SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-30-2005 07:03 AM |
Threaded Mode