 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
09-21-2016, 06:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Nice card Jay!
It appears the back of the card is what holds the grade down. Difficult to tell, but it looks like the color portion of the back is at, or runs right to the edge of the card. If the color runs into the edge, PSA may designate the card as MC, or miss cut. As it stands, the back looks like its off center. The front looks nice, and corners seem sharp from what I can tell from the scans. Since SGC doesn't designate qualifiers with cards, you're kind of left to educated guessing. If the card goes to PSA, you're looking at a qualifier of 6 OC or 6 MC, which a 4 at SGC is probably correct. This is a card most of us wold love to have, especially at a 4 price!!!
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it just me or do these seem undergraded ??? | Joshchisox08 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-31-2015 06:33 PM |
| Undergraded??? | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-15-2013 06:51 AM |
| Undergraded? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-25-2010 01:10 AM |
| Undergraded???....lets see 'em | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 12-01-2009 09:38 AM |
| Truly undergraded or trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-15-2008 09:31 AM |
Threaded Mode