 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
03-01-2016, 09:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
An interesting idea, but I don't see it happening, unless enough people want it and a new grading company launches with this new philosophy.
I think they closest you'll come is the current qualified PSA grades. They do half of what you're asking for in that the numerical grade refers to post production and if it's a PD, OC, or MC the qualifier is for the factory issue. I do wish that all companies would add the subgrades, if for nothing else than clarity on why a card received a certain grade. I would also like to see another category added for focus/registration.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. Last edited by pokerplyr80; 03-01-2016 at 09:46 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comments and thoughts needed re: PSA grading | Sidepocket | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 11-05-2015 12:33 PM |
| Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-16-2014 08:58 PM |
| Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 11-14-2014 03:36 PM |
| My thoughts on these stupid grading posts | Kenny Cole | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 91 | 05-21-2010 11:47 PM |
| Thoughts on grading | ptowncoug3012 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-30-2010 09:52 PM |
Threaded Mode