![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi, Rob,
I agree with Tom. I think the Cantwell was probably trimmed at the top of the sheet. These are the first two gloss-less cards I've encountered, and they appear to be hand-cut, hence my interest. Any thoughts from anyone else? Cheers, Mike
__________________
http://t209-contentnea.com Buying 1905-1915 Southern League cards, PCs, & memorabilia / T210: Series 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 & 8 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T210 Oddity? | John V | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-12-2014 10:23 AM |
Paying well for a t209 printing error/ghost/oddity *Either Series is fine* | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 11-03-2014 02:23 PM |
Needing an e93 Printing variation/blank-back/goof/oddity for my collection | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-30-2014 09:00 PM |
Would love to add a t204 or t207 Error/Ghost/Printing Oddity to my collection... | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 07-17-2013 08:27 AM |
Printing oddity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-28-2006 04:47 PM |