![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I acquired Cantwell and Bivens (middle) in the recent REA auction. Cantwell, with its uneven borders, appears to be hand-cut, and I suspect that Bivens may be as well, especially with the uneven cut at the top border.
It is also interesting that neither card appears to have had the protective finish applied to it resulting in a flat printed surface devoid of the gloss that characterizes T210s. The contrast between black/white is not as deep when the gloss finish is not used. (For comparison I’ve scanned a Bivens card with the gloss finish.) I’m wondering if most hand-cut versions of T210s resulted from reject sheets that did not have the gloss coat applied. Does anyone else have hand-cut/gloss-less examples they could post, or send me privately (mpeich12@gmail.com)? Thanks for looking and for sharing information. Cheers, Mike
__________________
http://t209-contentnea.com Buying 1905-1915 Southern League cards, PCs, & memorabilia / T210: Series 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 & 8 Last edited by Michael Peich; 05-05-2015 at 12:47 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T210 Oddity? | John V | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-12-2014 10:23 AM |
Paying well for a t209 printing error/ghost/oddity *Either Series is fine* | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 11-03-2014 02:23 PM |
Needing an e93 Printing variation/blank-back/goof/oddity for my collection | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-30-2014 09:00 PM |
Would love to add a t204 or t207 Error/Ghost/Printing Oddity to my collection... | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 07-17-2013 08:27 AM |
Printing oddity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-28-2006 04:47 PM |