![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't the separate sheet explanation a lot simpler? I don't think any printer would add a step where sheets had to be trimmed before backs were printed on there. The small number of no prints in the large brands doesn't really need to be explained away...they just printed a greater variety of fronts for the large brands.
Mac |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proof? T206 were printed in rows of more than twelve | t206hound | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 04-16-2022 11:49 AM |
Were PIEDMONT 460 factory #42 & UZIT backs printed simultaneously ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 11-10-2011 11:25 AM |
T206 Wagner (no, not THAT one) with name printed at top AND bottom! Ends Monday 2/8 | scooter729 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 11 | 02-09-2010 05:39 AM |
Were T206's printed on sheets of 48 Subjects ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 04-27-2007 08:50 AM |
Where were T206 printed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-12-2006 09:42 AM |