 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-29-2014, 04:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Are These Printers Marks?
I bought some cards from Luke on the B/S/T to use in soaking practice (I've never tried it before). On the Bridwell card, there are interesting marks on the back. I am wondering if they are printer's marks, or if maybe just an artifact of whatever the card was originally affixed to. I think the paper is still attached with the paper turning transparent when wet.
Any Opinions? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Printers marks | Snowbaron | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-03-2013 09:04 PM |
| Printers Scrap | Frank A | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-02-2012 10:14 AM |
| Could this be printers scrap??? | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-01-2011 07:49 PM |
| Possible variation T205 Nee Printers mark on card vs No printers mark | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 10-15-2010 12:09 AM |
| T201 "printers scrap" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-28-2003 08:18 PM |
Threaded Mode