 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26
09-25-2014, 06:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The Type system is for classification, not assigning merit or artistic value. Whether a photo is Type 1 or not doesn't make it 2 better than any other photo which happens to be a Type 3. And if you really really like a photo re-shot from an attractive arrangement of die-cut, hand-lettered, artistically-embellished 1st generation photos, I mean really really REALLY like, it still doesn't make it a Type 1. Desirability does not define Type classification, and a Type number is not a comment on a photo's artistic merit.
Put another way, a photo's Type may affect its desirability, but desirability does not affect its Type. To answer the OP's question, the 1909 Pirates composite is a Type 3. And a very desirable one at that.
__________________
Ebay Store and Weekly Auctions Web Store with better selection and discounts Polite corrections for unidentified and misidentified photos appreciated. Rude corrections also appreciated, but less so. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Difference between Type 1 and Type 2 Press Photos... | jgmp123 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 38 | 05-05-2024 05:40 PM |
| The better angels of our nature... | David Atkatz | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 12 | 04-20-2012 09:06 AM |
| Original Photos / Type I photos and Autographs | CharleyBrown | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 12 | 12-05-2011 12:38 AM |
| Sequential & Composite Period Photos | D. Broughman | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 02-14-2011 05:26 AM |
| Type 1 Photos | HRBAKER | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 09-10-2010 07:22 PM |
Threaded Mode