![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Each forum member is right on this post. The popularity of the Cracker Jacks, especially the 1914's, is likely never to wane. The name 'Cracker Jack' ensures that, as does the unique beauty of the cards, the relatively low number of cards comprising the set (with no back variations to deal with), and also the challenging nature of completing it, which can be done with perseverance.
Recent auctions, eBay and otherwise, certainly show that the 1914 set is hotter than ever. ( Note that a Psa 4 Becker sold for about $1200 this past November in a memory lane auction.) The recent surge in prices is simply a reflection of a surge in set collectors. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D310 tint answers, solutions, theories, challenge | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 04-21-2023 04:47 PM |
E96 Rossman "Cleveland"--Any Theories? | sreader3 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-22-2014 09:37 PM |
Theories on T206 backs having fewer subjects | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-22-2007 10:34 PM |
My theories on the forgeries | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-08-2003 06:45 PM |
Weird T206 Card - need theories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-10-2003 12:06 PM |