![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My 2 cents - I think that part of the increase in prices is due to the nostalgic link between Cracker Jack and baseball.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D310 tint answers, solutions, theories, challenge | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 04-21-2023 04:47 PM |
E96 Rossman "Cleveland"--Any Theories? | sreader3 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-22-2014 09:37 PM |
Theories on T206 backs having fewer subjects | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-22-2007 10:34 PM |
My theories on the forgeries | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-08-2003 06:45 PM |
Weird T206 Card - need theories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-10-2003 12:06 PM |