Article on 3rd Party Authenticators

[Lordstan]

Originally Posted by Lucky

Little lost...are you advising the information in the article and the highlighted facts found through court documents in it have been covered or that I shouldn't have posted this as all the information on 3rd party authenticators has already been posted in other threads? Please clue me in. I lurk here and this is my first thread. My thread wasn't meant to cover old ground nor cause members here to read what had been covered in other threads.

I meant nothing like that at all. It's a very good article. I brings to the general public, issues that those in the autograph collecting world have been discussing. I was merely linking to some threads where some of the examples he cited have been discussed in more detail for those who might want more information about the specifics.
I'm glad you posted it.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk