 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
12-26-2013, 05:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Waz- Based upon my experience, I actually think SGC was extremely strict in their grading during their initial years. I do not think there is a difference in value, not at all. Furthermore, if you try to review and bump and old SGC graded card, worst scenario is they would encapsulate it with a new holder if it did not bump...
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Under valued (or underappreciated autographs) | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 07-30-2012 11:54 AM |
| Are all PSA 5s equally valued? | wmullis | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-26-2011 04:12 PM |
| Mastro 0% on PSA Cards Valued Over $1000 - Why? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-16-2008 06:46 PM |
| D303 - under appreciated and valued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-08-2003 03:33 PM |
| Most under-valued vintage set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-01-2002 11:13 AM |
Threaded Mode