 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34
12-10-2013, 08:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Now that I have finished reading..
I agree with Leon, they are only guilty of small scans. If I am buying a group of cards that are in PSA/SGC 1 (I used to buy bulk t206 cards in low grade back in the day). I generally expect every single card to be mangled and I bid accordingly. By SGC's grading criteria, a "1" designation is in "poor" condition. You received cards that were in poor condition. You shouldn't have expected anything better. On a side note, if this happened to me and it legitimately upset me I would have asked for a $50 refund, not $260. $260 seems like you are trying to pull a fast one on them. The cards aren't worth $260 less because they are a low end 1 instead of a high end 1. They are worth virtually the same. Why did you expect they would offer you the buyers AND sellers premium back? Last edited by jhs5120; 12-10-2013 at 08:44 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone else having problem w/SGC set reg? | Vegas-guy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-13-2012 11:02 AM |
| Legendary Auctions - Problem last night | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-18-2010 05:24 PM |
| Problem with SCD | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-09-2010 05:08 AM |
| Looking for honest opinions on Legendary's T-206 Eddie Plank | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 74 | 03-15-2010 06:38 PM |
| SGC Problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2008 05:59 AM |
Threaded Mode