![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It certainly looks very suspicious, but I'm not willing to go as far as to say that the omission on the condition was definitely done on purpose without doing more investigation. And even then, I still would be basing an opinion on the so-called "preponderance of evidence". Let me ask you this. What do you feel would be an appropriate response if they only found out about it on my phone call?
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone else having problem w/SGC set reg? | Vegas-guy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-13-2012 11:02 AM |
Legendary Auctions - Problem last night | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-18-2010 05:24 PM |
Problem with SCD | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-09-2010 05:08 AM |
Looking for honest opinions on Legendary's T-206 Eddie Plank | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 74 | 03-15-2010 06:38 PM |
SGC Problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2008 05:59 AM |