![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From my understanding, unless it is a true print defect "boldness" falls under eye appeal subjectivity which is just that: subjective. I think that the issue and the issue's propensity to provide cards with such a characteristic also play a part. Those, however, are just things I think and my history advisor keeps telling me to quit thinking and do more research so I'm probably wrong because I didn't do the proper research.
![]() Personally if the lighter card was not off-center and pulled the same grade or better as the bolder one I'd still pay more for the bold card. Buy the card not the holder. Edit: Probably should have read your whole post. If the card is missing a color run or had a printing plate issue which should fall under "print defect". PSA has a qualifier for such an occurrence.
__________________
Always looking for rare Tommy Bridges items. Last edited by sbfinley; 10-30-2013 at 12:51 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC card grading question | tbob | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-21-2013 11:14 AM |
Very basic question | robsbessette | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-16-2011 10:01 AM |
Basic T206 checklist question | kllrbee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-31-2011 06:22 AM |
Grading card question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-26-2008 04:52 PM |
Basic Question about '65 Topps Push Pulls | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 12-17-2007 04:59 PM |